justbyfaith
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2023
- Messages
- 186
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Calvary Chapel
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- No
Luke 1:35 tells me that Jesus was conceived of the Holy Spirit in the womb of the virgin Mary and was born ("begotten") nine months later.
I will say again that God gave His only begotten Son when His Son died on the Cross for our sins; and therefore He was begotten before He died and therefore before He was resurrected.
Jesus was clearly begotten in the incarnation (Luke 1:35). That is sound doctrine.
There is also a sense in which He was begotten in the resurrection; but this is not to deny that He was begotten, also, in the incarnation.
If your verses declare that He was begotten in the resurrection, then my verse (Luke 1:35) declares that He was begotten in the incarnation.
Since "begotten" means "born" (and yes, I am here going to re-define the terms), then Jesus was begotten nine months after the juncture of Luke 1:35 when He was born as a Man on the face of the earth.
I am still curious as to what it is that you think it means that He was begotten in the resurrection. What exactly took place there; that you say He was begotten?
You need to know that Jesus is and always has been the Son of God from the moment of His conception to His ascending into eternity to exist outside of time.
So, He did not "become one with the Son of God" as a Man, when He rose from the dead.
He was the Son of God the whole time that He walked the earth; therefore He was begotten in the incarnation!
I will say again that God gave His only begotten Son when His Son died on the Cross for our sins; and therefore He was begotten before He died and therefore before He was resurrected.
Jesus was clearly begotten in the incarnation (Luke 1:35). That is sound doctrine.
There is also a sense in which He was begotten in the resurrection; but this is not to deny that He was begotten, also, in the incarnation.
If your verses declare that He was begotten in the resurrection, then my verse (Luke 1:35) declares that He was begotten in the incarnation.
Since "begotten" means "born" (and yes, I am here going to re-define the terms), then Jesus was begotten nine months after the juncture of Luke 1:35 when He was born as a Man on the face of the earth.
I am still curious as to what it is that you think it means that He was begotten in the resurrection. What exactly took place there; that you say He was begotten?
You need to know that Jesus is and always has been the Son of God from the moment of His conception to His ascending into eternity to exist outside of time.
So, He did not "become one with the Son of God" as a Man, when He rose from the dead.
He was the Son of God the whole time that He walked the earth; therefore He was begotten in the incarnation!
Last edited: