The Two Revelation Beasts

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It's easy to get confused in Revelation about the two different beast types, especially if we listen to men's doctrines outside of God's written Word. But staying with written Scripture easily reveals the difference.

Rev 13:1-3
13 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
KJV


1st Beast:

The above is a beast that rises up out of waters of a sea. In contrast to the beast of old mentioned in Revelation 12:3-4, this one here is to have "ten crowns" instead of seven like the beast of old when Satan first rebelled.

This 1st beast is related to a 'kingdom', simply because we are shown it has ten horns, seven heads, and ten crowns. The KJV translation above uses personal pronouns like "his", but the Greek actually could have been translated as 'it' also. Because of that personal pronoun of "his", some make the mistake of interpreting this 1st beast as a person. It's not. It's a kingdom beast, as even verse 2 above reveals by pointing to previous beast kingdoms back in the Book of Daniel. The "lion" symbol represented the Babylon empire under king Nebuchadnezzar. The "leopard" symbol represented Alexander The Great's Grecia empire.

The Revelation 17 chapter defines these beast symbols further. There we are told the "seven heads" represent "seven mountains" (Rev.17:9), which are areas upon the earth. This Rev.13:1 beast that comes up out of the sea is linked with the "waters" of Rev.17, which represent peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues, which further points to a system over the nations of the earth (Rev.17:15).

Rev 13:3
3 And I saw
one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

That above verse is specifically pointing to the very end of this world, with this kingdom beast at one time having suffered a "deadly wound", but then is healed. And then it suggests that because it was healed, the whole world wondered after it, preparing for what is revealed in the next verses...

Rev 13:4-9
4 And
they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, "Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?"
5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8
And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
KJV

Mind you, our Lord Jesus Christ is Who is revealing that through His servant Apostle John. And anytime Lord Jesus says things like, "If any man have an ear, let him hear", He is pointing to those who are given spiritual ears to understand. If you understood what I covered about who the Antichrist will actually be per my other Thread, then this Rev.13:4-8 section goes with that about the "dragon", which Revelation 12:9 reveals is just another title for Satan himself.

The above shows the whole world, except Christ's elect, will worship Satan (that "dragon" above), and also his beast kingdom. When the Antichrist-dragon comes to power in Jerusalem for the end, over ALL... nations, who will be able to make war with him? We are almost there already today with the United Nations international apparatus, using the militaries of many nations to police today's world. It still lacks the coming one-world leader (the next beast I will cover), but it appears that is not far off today.

Thus the healing of the "deadly wound" with the above is pointing to the coming one-world system for the end, and the world worshiping it and the dragon (Satan). Notice the Rev.13:3 verse also points out that "one of his heads" is what suffered the "deadly wound". That means one of the "seven heads", and thus one of the "seven mountains", or areas upon the earth. Some believe today's setting up by globalists of a "one world government" is what suffers the "deadly wound", and the Antichrist comes to heal it. Possibly. But there's also the possibility that it is pointing to that beast system of old mentioned back in Rev.12:3-4 when Satan drew a third of the angels ("stars") with him when he first rebelled in the old world coveting God's throne for himself. I feel like this is the greater possibility for when the "deadly wound" happened, since Rev.12:3-4 first showed us about an ancient beast kingdom that had only "seven crowns" instead of "ten crowns" like the latter Rev.13:1 example.

The above Rev.13:5-7 Scripture was also first prophesied in the Book of Daniel chapters 7 & 8 about the "little horn" and the "king of fierce countenance" for the end. The "forty and two months" is pointing to the latter half of the Daniel 9:27 symbolic "one week" of 7 years, specifically the latter half of 1260 days. A parallel to that 42 months is also linked with the time the Gentiles will tread the holy city per Rev.11, in which God's two witnesses will prophesy in Jerusalem for 1260 days against the beast.
 
Last edited:

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Second Beast:

Rev 13:11-17
11 And I beheld another beast coming
up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

This "another beast" is the 2nd beast. This 2nd beast comes up out of the earth. Just who does Revelation also declare that comes up out of the bottomless pit, and is king over the bottomless pit? The devil (per Rev.11:7; Rev.17:8; Rev.9:11). The bottomless pit is symbolic of Satan's abode in the heavenly dimension. Some actually believe the abode of the wicked called Hades is located in the heart of the earth. I believe it is in the heavenly dimension, which is how Satan is still able to appear before God's throne to accuse us, per Rev.12:10. Once he and his angels are cast out of the heavenly like it says there, then he will no longer be able to appear before God's throne in Heaven in order to accuse us. (see my Antichrist thread).

Notice this 2nd beast will appear "like a lamb". What's that about? Well, who is The Lamb Slain? Lord Jesus Christ. Could this mean Satan is coming as a false-Christ to play Lord Jesus? That is exactly what this is pointing to, and Lord Jesus warned us about that in the Matthew 24:23-26 Scripture, and said don't believe it when they say, "Lo, here is Christ, or there." And to top this off, Lord Jesus reveals this one that will appear "like a lamb", will actually speak like "a dragon", pointing directly to the devil. So who are we going to listen to, Lord Jesus in the above Scripture, or to man's doctrine which tries to take this understanding out of our minds?



12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

That shows a contrast between the two different beast types. This 2nd beast, a person (the devil), will have all the power of the 1st beast, and even cause the whole world to worship his kingdom beast, which had the deadly wound that was healed.


13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

This 2nd beast, the devil as the coming Antichrist for the end, will be able to work supernatural signs and wonders on the earth, "in the sight of men". Why would Lord Jesus include that last little phrase, "in the sight of men"? It should be obvious that false one will work those wonders and miracles in the sight of people on earth, so why point that out specifically? It's because that is going to be Satan himself come to our earthly dimension working those supernatural signs and wonders in our plain sight. And did you know that God has already pronounced Satan's destruction being 'upon the earth' in the sight of men also? (see Ezekiel 28:18).


14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

That above gives us a bit more info about the "deadly wound" that was healed. It reveals the "deadly wound" that happened before was caused "by a sword". Do you recall that when Lord Jesus returns in our near future per Rev.19, He will wield a sword that cuts both ways? I believe this "sword" here was Jesus' sword in the old world, back when Satan rebelled with that previous Rev.12:3-4 beast system. God ended the time of Satan's original rebellion against Him. That is when I believe the "deadly wound" happened, being upon Satan's original kingdom he tried to setup against God in the ancient world when Satan did the very first sin in the beginning. And for the end in our near future, I believe Lord Jesus will come with His Sword and end this final Rev.13 beast also.


15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
KJV


Want to know what the "abomination of desolation" is about per the Book of Daniel? There it is. It is an IDOL abomination setup by the coming Antichrist-dragon in false worship. In many respects, the coming false-Messiah represents what Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon did per history. Old Neb setup a gold idol image of himself, and demanded that all worship it or be killed.
 

shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
103
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I believe the first beast which had the wound by the sword and yet lived is Israel. The nation which was once thought to be dead.
In 1948 when it was revived, people from all over he world wo deed after it.
The second beast has yet to arrive in Israel. As I understand it comes from the north. Is sent to Israel by the king of the north. It's an army that first abolishes the daily sacrifice and them 1290 days afterward will place the abomination of desolation.
 

1689Dave

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2022
Messages
1,871
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
Victorinus of Pettau (c. 300 CE), the oldest commentary on Revelation teaches the Recapitulation view of Revelation

1. The Recapitulation Theory. The theory that the book of Revelation describes the same events several times from different points of view is an old and venerable interpretive strategy. This position was taken by Victorinus of Pettau, the author of the oldest surviving commentary (d. ca. 304). He stated that both the trumpets and the bowls predict the eschatological punishment of unbelievers (Haussleiter 1916: 84, line 14–86, line 7). This approach was adopted by Tyconius in his lost, but heavily cited, commentary and by Augustine. It dominated the interpretation of the book for centuries.

Collins, A. Y. (1992). Revelation, Book of. In D. N. Freedman (Ed.), The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (Vol. 5, p. 696). New York: Doubleday.

Essentially, Revelation has parallel accounts of history, present, and future. Primarily in the Seals, Trumpets, and Bowles. Each depicts history leading up to the end of the world. Just as the gospels show different views of the same events.

You can see the Antichrist in history, the present, and the future, all relevant to the times in which the reader lives. If you are looking for a future Antichrist, he's been here from the start.

It's worth looking into since it is tried and proven.
 

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I believe the first beast which had the wound by the sword and yet lived is Israel. The nation which was once thought to be dead.
In 1948 when it was revived, people from all over he world wo deed after it.
The second beast has yet to arrive in Israel. As I understand it comes from the north. Is sent to Israel by the king of the north. It's an army that first abolishes the daily sacrifice and them 1290 days afterward will place the abomination of desolation.
I believe the beast that suffered the deadly wound was about Satan's original rebellion in the old world when he coveted God's throne. (see Isaiah 14; Ezekiel 28 and Ezekiel 31). That old beast kingdom has only "seven crowns" per Rev.12:3-4. Because a 2nd version of that old beast is to happen for the end of this world, per Rev.13, and is shown will have "ten crowns" instead of seven, I believe this final beast kingdom for the end is the event of the deadly wound being healed. Rev.17:8 also gives a hint like this about the beast king who was, and is not, and yet is. Here's how I see that...

1. "who was" = Satan's original beast kingdom of Rev.12:3-4 when he first rebelled in the old world prior to Adam and Eve.

2. "and is not" = all the way up to John's time, the 7th beast king of Rev.17:10 is still yet to appear on earth today, because that 7th one will be the final Antichrist for this present world

3. "and yet is" = the future time of the end of this world for the great tribulation, when the final Antichrist will be setup as that 7th beast king prior to Jesus' future return.
 

shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
103
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I believe the beast that suffered the deadly wound was about Satan's original rebellion in the old world when he coveted God's throne. (see Isaiah 14; Ezekiel 28 and Ezekiel 31). That old beast kingdom has only "seven crowns" per Rev.12:3-4. Because a 2nd version of that old beast is to happen for the end of this world, per Rev.13, and is shown will have "ten crowns" instead of seven, I believe this final beast kingdom for the end is the event of the deadly wound being healed. Rev.17:8 also gives a hint like this about the beast king who was, and is not, and yet is. Here's how I see that...

1. "who was" = Satan's original beast kingdom of Rev.12:3-4 when he first rebelled in the old world prior to Adam and Eve.

2. "and is not" = all the way up to John's time, the 7th beast king of Rev.17:10 is still yet to appear on earth today, because that 7th one will be the final Antichrist for this present world

3. "and yet is" = the future time of the end of this world for the great tribulation, when the final Antichrist will be setup as that 7th beast king prior to Jesus' future return.
The beast is 8th, not the 7th.
Rev 17:11
The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.
 

shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
103
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The 7th kingdom to reign over Israel was great Britton. That was the kingdom israel declared its independence from.
The beast isn't great Britton. Isn't the 7th.
 

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Victorinus of Pettau (c. 300 CE), the oldest commentary on Revelation teaches the Recapitulation view of Revelation

1. The Recapitulation Theory. The theory that the book of Revelation describes the same events several times from different points of view is an old and venerable interpretive strategy. This position was taken by Victorinus of Pettau, the author of the oldest surviving commentary (d. ca. 304). He stated that both the trumpets and the bowls predict the eschatological punishment of unbelievers (Haussleiter 1916: 84, line 14–86, line 7). This approach was adopted by Tyconius in his lost, but heavily cited, commentary and by Augustine. It dominated the interpretation of the book for centuries.

Collins, A. Y. (1992). Revelation, Book of. In D. N. Freedman (Ed.), The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (Vol. 5, p. 696). New York: Doubleday.

Essentially, Revelation has parallel accounts of history, present, and future. Primarily in the Seals, Trumpets, and Bowles. Each depicts history leading up to the end of the world. Just as the gospels show different views of the same events.

You can see the Antichrist in history, the present, and the future, all relevant to the times in which the reader lives. If you are looking for a future Antichrist, he's been here from the start.

It's worth looking into since it is tried and proven.
Only partially true.

Remember how the Reformation back in history thought the pope then was the Antichrist that Jesus and His apostles warned about for the end of this world? Because of the Reformers being persecuted (murdered) by the Catholic Church back then, the Protestants thought the pope was the Antichrist. He wasn't, and still is not today either. Thus the old interpreters and commentators were wrong on that, even though some deceived still follow those old unproven ideas of the Reformers.

Also, the idea that 'The Antichrist' has happened many times in history, even by the old commentators, is a misunderstanding of the Scripture, and instead heeding of a tradition by men. In 1 John 2:18, John gave TWO "antichrist" examples, not one. The first phrase John said is about how they had already heard that "antichrist" shall come. That is about a SINGULAR ANTICHRIST that Jesus warned His about that is to come at the end per His Olivet discourse and the Book of John.

The last phrase of "many antichrists" is about the many workers of iniquity that have already been at work, even back to Old Testament times, and is what those commentators were actually referring to. Apostle Paul also called that working the "mystery of iniquity" in 2 Thess.2.
 

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The beast is 8th, not the 7th.
Rev 17:11
The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.
All this verse section must weighed...

Rev 17:8-11
8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and
shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Right at the above beginning we are shown who that beast king is. It is Satan himself, for he is that angel of the bottomless pit, and even a king per the Revelation 9:11. Satan is that beast that was, and is not, and yet is. The majority of the world is already blind to this understanding.


9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

10 And
there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
KJV


Verse 10 is about 7 kings only. Five were past history. The 6th, with "and one is", was in Apostle John's day (Roman emperor Domitian). The 7th was not yet come in John's day.

And when the 7th king does come, he will only be a short space of time. That is the shortened time for the end that Lord Jesus said He shortened for His elect's sake, i.e., the time of "great tribulation" for the very end of this present world. Thus the 7th beast king is the coming pseudo-Christ in Jerusalem for the end just prior to Christ's future return.

The 8th king, ALSO is said to go into perdition. So there's that old, beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit and goes into perdition idea again, of verse 8. It's about Satan as the 8th king, but when if he also is the 7th king? The 8th king role is set only for after... Christ's future "thousand years" reign of Rev.20. It will be when Satan is loosed out of his pit prison one final time to go tempt the nations that will have heard The Gospel during that thousand years, and will be held accountable for their belief, tested by Satan.
 

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The 7th kingdom to reign over Israel was great Britton. That was the kingdom israel declared its independence from.
The beast isn't great Britton. Isn't the 7th.
The 7th beast kingdom will be the final "one world government" system setup over all... nations for the end of this world, with the coming pseudo-Christ sitting over it. This system is almost complete today. It will be finalized when that false-Messiah arrives at Jerusalem and pushes the rebuilding of a new Jewish temple with sacrifices and old covenant worship started up again.
 

shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
103
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
All this verse section must weighed...

Rev 17:8-11
8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and
shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Right at the above beginning we are shown who that beast king is. It is Satan himself, for he is that angel of the bottomless pit, and even a king per the Revelation 9:11. Satan is that beast that was, and is not, and yet is. The majority of the world is already blind to this understanding.


9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.

10 And
there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
KJV


Verse 10 is about 7 kings only. Five were past history. The 6th, with "and one is", was in Apostle John's day (Roman emperor Domitian). The 7th was not yet come in John's day.

And when the 7th king does come, he will only be a short space of time. That is the shortened time for the end that Lord Jesus said He shortened for His elect's sake, i.e., the time of "great tribulation" for the very end of this present world. Thus the 7th beast king is the coming pseudo-Christ in Jerusalem for the end just prior to Christ's future return.

The 8th king, ALSO is said to go into perdition. So there's that old, beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit and goes into perdition idea again, of verse 8. It's about Satan as the 8th king, but when if he also is the 7th king? The 8th king role is set only for after... Christ's future "thousand years" reign of Rev.20. It will be when Satan is loosed out of his pit prison one final time to go tempt the nations that will have heard The Gospel during that thousand years, and will be held accountable for their belief, tested by Satan.
The 7 kings represent 7 kingdoms
There have been 7 kingdoms whk hzve reigned over Israel. 5 had fallen before John wrote Rev. 1 was still reig ing at the time which was Rome. The seventh was great Britton which continued a short space after israel declared its independence.
The 8th will be one of the 7 but its not great Britton. I would put my mo ey on Iran(Persia) as taking Jerusalem in the end when the two witnesses are killed.

We will see. As of now. Israel chooses its own king since it rejected Christ. I suspect Netanyahu will soon mark all of israel within a few years. His cashless society is very close to being finished.
 

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The 7 kings represent 7 kingdoms
There have been 7 kingdoms whk hzve reigned over Israel. 5 had fallen before John wrote Rev. 1 was still reig ing at the time which was Rome. The seventh was great Britton which continued a short space after israel declared its independence.
The 8th will be one of the 7 but its not great Britton. I would put my mo ey on Iran(Persia) as taking Jerusalem in the end when the two witnesses are killed.

We will see. As of now. Israel chooses its own king since it rejected Christ. I suspect Netanyahu will soon mark all of israel within a few years. His cashless society is very close to being finished.
Actually per God's Word, there have only been 6 beast kingdoms of history so far. Since the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the 2nd temple, there has never been a king of the house of David setup there. The coming Antichrist-false-Messiah for the END is to be associated with Judah and the house of David, because that is the Biblical requirement about the prophets concerning Messiah, who they are still waiting for to come. This is why Jesus in Matthew 24:23-26 would warn that in Jerusalem for the trib time, if someone comes up to you and says, "Lo, Christ is here, or there", to believe it not.

Britain never setup a beast king in a rebuilt Jewish temple there in Jerusalem. Their working in Jerusalem back in history does not fit the prophecy about the coming pseudo-Christ for the end at all. The Antichrist beast king for the end, the 7th one, is to be setup in the time just before Lord Jesus returns.
 

1689Dave

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2022
Messages
1,871
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
Only partially true.

Remember how the Reformation back in history thought the pope then was the Antichrist that Jesus and His apostles warned about for the end of this world? Because of the Reformers being persecuted (murdered) by the Catholic Church back then, the Protestants thought the pope was the Antichrist. He wasn't, and still is not today either. Thus the old interpreters and commentators were wrong on that, even though some deceived still follow those old unproven ideas of the Reformers.

Also, the idea that 'The Antichrist' has happened many times in history, even by the old commentators, is a misunderstanding of the Scripture, and instead heeding of a tradition by men. In 1 John 2:18, John gave TWO "antichrist" examples, not one. The first phrase John said is about how they had already heard that "antichrist" shall come. That is about a SINGULAR ANTICHRIST that Jesus warned His about that is to come at the end per His Olivet discourse and the Book of John.

The last phrase of "many antichrists" is about the many workers of iniquity that have already been at work, even back to Old Testament times, and is what those commentators were actually referring to. Apostle Paul also called that working the "mystery of iniquity" in 2 Thess.2.
Can you spot Papal doctrines in your church? He is still the Antichrist just as the Reformers said. Only the USA's separation of church and state law now protects us from him. He still sits in the Temple of God through the Baptism formula. Free Will, Dispensationalism, infant baptism, sacramentalism....
 
Last edited:

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Can you spot Papal doctrines in your church? He is still the Antichrist just as the Reformers said. Only the USA's separation of church and state law now protects us from him. He still sits in the Temple of God through the Baptism formula. Free Will, Dispensationalism, infant baptism, sacramentalism....
No, the pope is not the Antichrist for the end of this world. And I say that as a descendant of French huguenots (first French Protestants) that fled to the Americas in the 1600s.

Believing a pope can be the final Antichrist for the end shows being misled by men's traditions instead of staying in Bible Scripture.

The early Church father Hippolytus remarked how the Antichrist for the end will come through the Jews...

Hippolytus

“Now as our Lord Jesus Christ, who is also God, was prophesied of under the figure of a lion, on account of his royalty and glory, in the same way have the scriptures also beforehand spoken of Antichrist as a lion, on account of his tyranny and violence. For the deceiver seeks to liken himself in all things to the Son of God. Christ is a lion, so Antichrist is also a lion. Christ is a king, so Antichrist is also a king. The Savior was manifested as a lamb, so he too in like manner will appear as a lamb without; within he is a wolf. The Savior came into the world in the circumcision [i.e., the Jewish race], and he will come in the same manner. . . . The Savior raised up and showed his holy flesh like a temple, and he will raise a temple of stone in Jerusalem” (The Antichrist 6 [A.D. 200]).

That is actually what Lord Jesus showed in His Olivet discourse of Matthew 24 and Mark 13 about the coming pseudo-Christ. The deceived Jews will present him as their 'king'.

So that ain't... gonna' be no Christian pope.
 

1689Dave

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2022
Messages
1,871
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
No, the pope is not the Antichrist for the end of this world. And I say that as a descendant of French huguenots (first French Protestants) that fled to the Americas in the 1600s.

Believing a pope can be the final Antichrist for the end shows being misled by men's traditions instead of staying in Bible Scripture.

The early Church father Hippolytus remarked how the Antichrist for the end will come through the Jews...

Hippolytus

“Now as our Lord Jesus Christ, who is also God, was prophesied of under the figure of a lion, on account of his royalty and glory, in the same way have the scriptures also beforehand spoken of Antichrist as a lion, on account of his tyranny and violence. For the deceiver seeks to liken himself in all things to the Son of God. Christ is a lion, so Antichrist is also a lion. Christ is a king, so Antichrist is also a king. The Savior was manifested as a lamb, so he too in like manner will appear as a lamb without; within he is a wolf. The Savior came into the world in the circumcision [i.e., the Jewish race], and he will come in the same manner. . . . The Savior raised up and showed his holy flesh like a temple, and he will raise a temple of stone in Jerusalem” (The Antichrist 6 [A.D. 200]).

That is actually what Lord Jesus showed in His Olivet discourse of Matthew 24 and Mark 13 about the coming pseudo-Christ. The deceived Jews will present him as their 'king'.

So that ain't... gonna' be no Christian pope.
Did you know the Jesuits provided the basis for Dispensationalism to deceive Protestants into thinking the Antichrist is yet future? It's true. That's where the hypothetical gap in Daniel's 70 weeks comes from. They turn Jesus who fulfilled the prophecy into the Antichrist who zillions of years later is supposed to fulfill it.
 

shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
103
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Actually per God's Word, there have only been 6 beast kingdoms of history so far. Since the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the 2nd temple, there has never been a king of the house of David setup there. The coming Antichrist-false-Messiah for the END is to be associated with Judah and the house of David, because that is the Biblical requirement about the prophets concerning Messiah, who they are still waiting for to come. This is why Jesus in Matthew 24:23-26 would warn that in Jerusalem for the trib time, if someone comes up to you and says, "Lo, Christ is here, or there", to believe it not.

Britain never setup a beast king in a rebuilt Jewish temple there in Jerusalem. Their working in Jerusalem back in history does not fit the prophecy about the coming pseudo-Christ for the end at all. The Antichrist beast king for the end, the 7th one, is to be setup in the time just before Lord Jesus returns.
So you believe Benjamin Netanyahu is not elected head of state of Israel?
 

Joshua1Eight

Well-known member
Joined
May 21, 2021
Messages
155
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
One is a dragon and the other is a dragon
 

SetFree

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
347
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

1689Dave

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 17, 2022
Messages
1,871
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
He is not the Antichrist prophesied to come.
The Papacy is the Antichrist. And He rules in practically every church in Christendom. But you need to know what He teaches before you can spot him in your church.
 

shilohsfoal

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
103
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
He is not the Antichrist prophesied to come.
The antichrist prophecied to come?
So you don't believe Benjamin Netanyahu could cause the Israelis to recieve a mark in their right hand or forehead in which to buy and sell with?
I bet he does with the stroke of a pen.
 
Top Bottom