Did Jesus celebrate the Holiday that commemorates the Maccabees?

[pinacled]

Nobody here except you thinks that the original KJV didn’t contain marginal notes referencing the apocrypha. You’re the only one here denying that fact. And you won’t find anyone here who is going to agree with you that this isn’t a genuine photocopy replica of the original King James. You’re alone on that point.

Perhaps Until you change your mind ill be alone in a facet of understanding.
But I'm fairly certain typewriters didn't exist in 1611.

Blessings Always

 

[pinacled]

Many here have already done the "work" and have proven your assumptions to be an error of understanding.
Whether or not you accept their work shows a form of bias.
Do you accept every form of information that is on the internet besides actual human interaction and communication.
Or are you willing to accept that you were hoodwinked by this company promoting an alleged anniversary version of the 1611 kjv bible.

Simply look closer at the fonts of the marginal notes and you'll find multiple time stamps.

Blessings Always

Ill add that zondervan publishing claims to have collaborated on and printed the first niv bible.
Which is a version that is heretical to Torah.

 

[pinacled]

Zoom in of marginal note in John 10:22.

Typewriter from around the 1930s possibly.
Excerpt;
[ The first electrically operated typewriter, consisting of a printing wheel, was invented by Thomas A. Edison in 1872 and later developed into the ticker-tape printer. The electric typewriter as an office writing machine was pioneered by James Smathers in 1920.]

 

[pinacled]

Zoom in of marginal note in John 10:22.

Did you take note of the errors in calligraphy ?

 

[pinacled]

Did you take note of the errors in calligraphy ?

Or old English?

 

[NathanH83]

Did they have typewriters in 1611?

It’s called the printing press, Genius. Invented in the 1400’s by Gutenberg. Do some research.

 

[NathanH83]

Ill add that zondervan publishing claims to have collaborated on and printed the first niv bible.
Which is a version that is heretical to Torah.

So what? The NIV had no influence on the original King James.
You still don’t know what “photocopy”means?

 

[pinacled]

It’s called the printing press, Genius. Invented in the 1400’s by Gutenberg. Do some research.

Actually the printing press is far older.
Likely 400bc or so.
Ie stamp.


But that is no concern involving our conversation.
Do you agree or disagree that the marginal notes are typewriter print from around 1930s?

If not I'll show you evidence that even the calligraphy in the scripts are not originally scribed by pen, ink, and hand as you have claimed they are.

 

[pinacled]

Actually the printing press is far older.
Likely 400bc or so.
Ie stamp.


But that is no concern involving our conversation.
Do you agree or disagree that the marginal notes are typewriter print from around 1930s?

If not I'll show you evidence that even the calligraphy in the scripts are not originally scribed by pen, ink, and hand as you have claimed they are.

Printing - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[NathanH83]

Actually the printing press is far older.
Likely 400bc or so.
Ie stamp.


But that is no concern involving our conversation.
Do you agree or disagree that the marginal notes are typewriter print from around 1930s?

If not I'll show you evidence that even the calligraphy in the scripts are not originally scribed by pen, ink, and hand as you have claimed they are.

Here’s Daniel 8:25 in the original 1611 KJV. It references 1 Maccabees 6:9.

By the way, these are just the King James references. There’s also the Geneva Bible, originally published in 1560, and is older than the King James Version.

The Geneva Bible is what the Pilgrims used. In 1620, when they sailed to America on the Mayflower, the King James Version had just recently been published, so it wasn’t quite as popular or widespread by that time. But the Geneva Bible was very popular back then.

I also have a photocopy replica of the 1560 Geneva Bible, and it also has marginal notes in both the Old and New Testaments, which reference the Apocrypha. The Geneva Bible also contains the Apocryphal section. All Protestant Bibles did back then.

 

[NathanH83]

Printing - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Here’s a screen shot from the table of contents in the original King James Bible:

 

[pinacled]

Here’s Daniel 8:25 in the original 1611 KJV. It references 1 Maccabees 6:9.

By the way, these are just the King James references. There’s also the Geneva Bible, originally published in 1560, and is older than the King James Version.

The Geneva Bible is what the Pilgrims used. In 1620, when they sailed to America on the Mayflower, the King James Version had just recently been published, so it wasn’t quite as popular or widespread by that time. But the Geneva Bible was very popular back then.

I also have a photocopy replica of the 1560 Geneva Bible, and it also has marginal notes in both the Old and New Testaments, which reference the Apocrypha. The Geneva Bible also contains the Apocryphal section. All Protestant Bibles did back then.

I'd hoped you would understand the concept of stenciling.

I'm curious to inspect more of your research material.

Even so,
Are you willing to admit that the marginal note is a print font from ye 1900s?

 

[NathanH83]

Printing - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

As you can see, the 1611 King James translators had the Apocrypha situated in-between the Old and New Testaments:

 

[pinacled]

As you can see, the 1611 King James translators had the Apocrypha situated in-between the Old and New Testaments:

M'Atthew missing a letter.
Error

 

[pinacled]

As you can see, the 1611 King James translators had the Apocrypha situated in-between the Old and New Testaments:

If you are promoting an errant press similar to currency you'll find a difficult time finding buyers here on this forum.
Wheat pennies are not valuable to old schooled veterans whom Love and keep the commandments.

Blessings Always

 

[pinacled]

As you can see, the 1611 King James translators had the Apocrypha situated in-between the Old and New Testaments:

Are you willing to admit that the marginal note is a print font from ye 1900s?

 

[NathanH83]

I'd hoped you would understand the concept of stenciling.

I'm curious to inspect more of your research material.

Even so,
Are you willing to admit that the marginal note is a print font from ye 1900s?

It’s not from the 1900’s. You’re making stuff up instead of actually researching this for yourself.

 

[NathanH83]

M'Atthew missing a letter.
Error

It’s not missing a letter.

 

[pinacled]

It’s not missing a letter.

A consonant is missing

 

[pinacled]

It’s not missing a letter.

I know you're detail trained