I like his messages, but I’d like him more if he shared (more?) of the Gospel.Joel Osteen likes to give inspiration, but he doesn't share the Gospel. At least not what I've heard from him.
He does share the Gospel. He just doesn't share what you believe to be the Gospel.Joel Osteen likes to give inspiration, but he doesn't share the Gospel. At least not what I've heard from him.
He does share the Gospel. He just doesn't share what you believe to be the Gospel.
Then, that's not the Gospel LOL He shares that God's will is that believers are blessed with material things.
Have you heard him talk about forgiveness of sins?
Perhaps because it doesn't edify him.And why doesn’t he accept the Apocrypha?
The Apocrypha was/is especially used for edification in the churches, not only by the early church fathers but Catholics and protestants as well.. the book of Tobit has many great examples of charity, blessings, faith, kindness towards strangers, prayer and humbleness as well as types and shadows of things to come with plenty of symbolic cues.Perhaps because it doesn't edify him.
Yes, some do find some parts of the Apocrypha relevant to their moment, which is why the Book of Sirach-Ecclesiasticus was quoted from in the 17th April 2021 funeral service for Prince Philip, the late Duke of Edinburgh.The Apocrypha was/is especially used for edification in the churches, not only by the early church fathers but Catholics and protestants as well.. the book of Tobit has many great examples of charity, blessings, faith, kindness towards strangers, prayer and humbleness as well as types and shadows of things to come with plenty of symbolic cues.
Perhaps because it doesn't edify him.
For some people who prefer the 66 Book canon for accuracy, authenticity and inspiration, the 'poc doesn't meet these criteria, hence their nonacceptance and difference of opinion.That determines scripture?
As I recall there is a clip of an interview with him in which he seems to endorse and align with Mormons.I think Joel Osteen and others similar to him, are all about Joel Osteen and developing follower/givers to his empire by making people feel good about themselves and encouraging them that they can have better lives.
For some people who prefer the 66 Book canon for accuracy, authenticity and inspiration, the 'poc doesn't meet these criteria, hence their nonacceptance and difference of opinion.
Tick that box.1 Maccabees is extremely historically accurate
Isn't that what "to repent" mean? To turn from sin towards righteousness?He makes it sound like if you stop sin then you can receive forgiveness. Is that his doctrine?
Isn't that what "to repent" mean? To turn from sin towards righteousness?