2 Questions for Trinitarians

Status
Not open for further replies.

atpollard

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
2,573
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
But you DO believe that God is three "persons".

As the song goes,

God in "three persons"...blessed Trinity.
”God in three persons” is not the same as “God is three persons” and SONGS are not the source of Christian Truth … Sola Scriptura (SCRIPTURE alone). The Athanasian Creed comes closer, but only scripture expresses the truth perfectly.
 

atpollard

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
2,573
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
But you DO believe that God is three "persons".

Obviously you Trinitarians believe that he had two Fathers?!

Do you even know what you believe?

Someone that believes none of what we believe is going to correct all of us on what we really believe.
23a2a6ee998024ea1820e89bcfe35745639f63e4c8f2f019ba00e7fef4f3bedd.jpg
 

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
39
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Spirit of God is Holy, "God is a spirit", God is invisible, God is I AM, Jesus is I AM, Jesus is the Spirit of Prophecy, Prophecy comes from The Holy Spirit of God and is the Word of God, Jesus is the Word of God made flesh, Jesus created all things, God created all things, God spoke from Heaven at the baptism of Christ and proclaimed Him His Son as the Holy Spirit rested on Jesus... and btw why was Jesus crucified?

"For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God"
 
Last edited:

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
That's precisely what the Trinitarians believe, therefore you're a "Trinitarian". You just deny it.
Unfortunately, No. You, who seem to be unitarian (or that which is like it), have a misunderstanding of the official and held definition of "trinity". Trinity and Trio are not the same, at all. I (and the position I hold from scripture) am not accepted by "trinitarians", nor 'credalists'. It is one of the very reasons I chose "No" when I signed up and answered the question "Do I accept the Trinity and Nicene Creed". I do not. They both contain error.

Would you like an official definition of "trinity", and see the difference between that and the eternal Heavenly Trio?
 

hedrick

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
683
Age
74
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
For many years I have struggled to understand the doctrine of the trinity. To say it is a mystery that we are not expected to comprehend simply doesn't cut it for me. Some time ago I discovered that in the original formulation of the trinity, the word in Greek which we traditionally have interpreted to mean "persons", as in "three persons in one God" is actually the same word used to designate the mask worn by actors in Greco-Roman theater. We cannot call this a "person" but we can certainly call it a "persona". This insight has put a totally new spin on the entire concept for me. We finite creatures cannot possibly hope to describe our transcendent God, but we can speak of the modes or roles or personae that assist our understanding. God as creator/father, God as spirit/sustainer, and the glimpse of God we obtain in the life and teaching of Jesus. In other words, trinity is not a description of God but is, rather, a description of the human experience of God in the language of fourth century Greek speaking Christianity. We are not limited to just these three. Any persona that promotes our understanding of and our relationship to God is completely acceptable. God could be mother as well as father. God could be Wisdom / Word / Allah / Krishna / Manitou. God's possibilities are endless. These are merely our human images of God. God is, as always, ONE.
That would be a reasonable comment for an early stage in development. It describes the "economic Trinity," meaning threefold action or appearance. But things didn't stop there. The final doctrine refers to ontology, not just how God acts on us but how he is. No existing word really was sufficient, so you can't use take normal definitions of persona, hypostasis or ousia as really explaining what is going on.
 

JRT

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Messages
780
Age
80
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
That would be a reasonable comment for an early stage in development. It describes the "economic Trinity," meaning threefold action or appearance. But things didn't stop there. The final doctrine refers to ontology, not just how God acts on us but how he is. No existing word really was sufficient, so you can't use take normal definitions of persona, hypostasis or ousia as really explaining what is going on.

Sh'ma Yisra'el, adonai 'eloheinu, adonai 'eḥad.

I think that sums it up neatly and is about as far as we can go.
 

hedrick

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
683
Age
74
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Sh'ma Yisra'el, adonai 'eloheinu, adonai 'eḥad.

I think that sums it up neatly and is about as far as we can go.
I’m not arguing what is true, but what the doctrine of the Trinity means, as generally understood. Personally I accept Nicea, but it allows more interpretations than later developments, and even those allow for several,understandings.

The problem with not going beyond the shema is that if Jesus shows us God it has implications. I’m about to go to bed, so I’ll say more later.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
31,689
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Sh'ma Yisra'el, adonai 'eloheinu, adonai 'eḥad.

I think that sums it up neatly and is about as far as we can go.
"Hear, O Israel: the LORD is our God, the LORD is One."

Yes, we believe in one God...as the Athanasian creed states one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity.
 

JRT

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Messages
780
Age
80
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity

To me this is completely incomprehensible --- a cross between a contradiction in terms and a circular argument. We agree that God is One so why attempt to go beyond that? It causes confusion and dissention without accomplishing anything positive in either a spiritual or corporate sense.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
31,689
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
one God in Trinity and Trinity in Unity

To me this is completely incomprehensible --- a cross between a contradiction in terms and a circular argument. We agree that God is One so why attempt to go beyond that? It causes confusion and dissention without accomplishing anything positive in either a spiritual or corporate sense.

Because it's incomprehensible to you it can't be true? What about having a man die on the cross and the sins of the world forgiven. That is foolishness to some people too, yet, it's true.

Just because it doesn't make sense to you doesn't mean it's not true.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,551
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Some years ago I visited a Hindu temple. I stood before the altar area staring in silent amazement at the multitude of images of various deities, some of them very bizarre indeed. I had been there several minutes when I heard a gentle voice behind me say "God is One." I turned to meet the pundit (priest) of the temple. As he escorted me around the altar area he explained that while God is One, we in our finitude are unable to comprehend the fullness of God in a single "take". Each one of the "deities" before us was simply a different manifestation of God's Oneness. We Christians have done much the same with our trinity theory. Interestingly enough, the pundit was also a nuclear chemistry professor at a nearby university.
There's no changing your mind about this, I think. However, now that we've had your theory outlined several times for us, we need to be clear that your theory--and that's all it is--stands in opposition to orthodox Christian belief AND, more important than that, to the Bible's description of the nature of God and the three persona of that God.
 

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
To me this is completely incomprehensible --- a cross between a contradiction in terms and a circular argument.
Yep. It's gobbledygook. It's theological gibberish. It's speaking in tongues. It's chasing ones own tail. It is incomprehensible. It is a contradiction, and circular, but worse, it's simply error. The theology denies the Father and the Son. It is of anti christ (vicarius christi).
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,730
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
But you DO believe that God is three "persons".

As the song goes,

God in "three persons"...blessed Trinity.


CORMAN767


AGAIN, the English word "person" here does NOT (at all) mean what you are imposing. Trinitarians are not Mormons (hint: Mormons aren't Trinitarian). "Persona" is from the Greek ("Person" is simply an English translation, or perhaps tranlituration). It's the word Christians chose to use.... because there is not a word for exactly what is here. The term (admittedly) comes from a heresy, one that argued that God is one but has 3 offices, vocations, jobs.... that He wears 3 "hats." Kind of like Joe Biden. He is a husband, a father, the president - 3 very different roles but one reality. This heresy (called model monarchianism, I'm probably spelling that wrong) was condemned as heresy BUT ironically the term "persona" (which refers to the masks that Greek actors wore) "stuck." It probably isn't the best word.... but then there is no word for this, The term "person" (persona) is SIMPLY an ATTEMPT to convey a threeness about God, the reality of Father and Son and Holy Spirit while still embracing the ONENESS of God.





MATTHEW TEN VERSEIGHT


Matthew ten Verseight said:
It is incomprehensible.


Exactly. Which is why rebuking the Trinity as incomprehensible is silly. It is called the MYSTERY of the Trinity because. well, it is mystery.... simply beyond our ability to comprehend (which is EXACTLY as I'd expect; we can only understand the world we live in - ie physics - and that we "understand" only in tiny part (I have a Ph.D. in physics),. God is not a part of creation and thus is not a part of anything we CAN understand (we simply have no point of reference, no common denominator so to speak).

Scripture states that God is ONE (and so the Trinity affirms that as true).... and Scripture speaks of Father and Son and Holy Spirit, each as God, each acting individually as God, each with the attributes of God... there is a certain "three-ness" about this (and so the Trinity affirms that). What we have is one but three or one yet three. Does that "fit" our current human concept of physics? Well... as one with a doctorate in physics, it's not at all incredible AND YET we avoid all attempts to subject the Creator to the creation, to subject what is SUPER-natural to the natural.... it is MYSTERY simply because here we have a reality that is above and beyond Creation, physics, science.... and thus beyond our ability to understand.




FOR THOSE WITH AN INTEREST IN SCIENCE....


As one of my physics profs once said, "What we've learned in the past century or so is that we know very little." Indeed, maybe 150 years ago, we THOUGHT we knew a lot.... now we realize we know precious little. I'd GUESS modern science has a handle on maybe 1% (max) of reality. And indeed, with every new bit of knowledge comes a host of questions. Every year, we learn that we know less than we thought we did.

AND what we largely affirm is that "reality" is simply what is "real" to US, right now, right here. "Reality" is kind of a bubble we live in as we experience it; it's FAR from everything. There may well be several universes even within this "bubble" - all unknowable to us because it's not OUR reality. In a sense, "out of synch" with each other even sharing the SAME reality (but PERHAPS "touching" each other.... a thought that intrigues me as a theist... this very point is what separates Deists from Theists. God MAY "interact" or "enter" or "touch" THIS reality (the Incarnation, miracles, etc). but He is not a part of or subject to this reality.

For laity, the best example perhaps is "the Big Bang" You are all familiar with this. Ask yourself: But WHAT reality was BEFORE that? And does such STILL exist beyond the result of "the Big Bang?" Well, as Christians, you are likely to say "GOD" (and theoretical physicists may be okay with that!) BUT there IS an affirmation that SOMETHING "was/is" outside, beyond the reality that came to be in that moment. Consider that...... It means that REALITY (as it applies to us.... to the 1% we understand such) is not the only REALITY. And everything that belongs to this (mass/energy/time... math) likely don't exist at all in some OTHER reality; "physics" applies to ONLY this one and is a product of an event (the Big Bang). It has nothing to do with other Realities and probably doesn't apply AT ALL. Which is why if you ask a physicist "what existed before the Big Bang?" or "What caused the Big Bang?" he/she will tell you, "that's unknowable."

Or consider this.... THIS reality has a starting point (and MAYBE an ending one) ... and it seems to be contained within a certain space (the entire universe has actually been mapped). What is outside that? There's ZERO reason to theorize that "nothing" does... but reason to conclude "OUR reality doesn't."


SOOOOOOOOO.....


God is not a part of the Creation. GOD is not a product of "the Big Bang." The Bible says that God CAUSED this reality to come into existence, NOT that this reality CAUSED God to come into existence.

What does this mean? What "is" in one reality is not going to "explain" or even necessarily apply to another. Our reality is not likely going to explain the reality of God for the very simple reason that He is not of this reality. There aren't going to be words or science or philosophy or mathematics to do so.... we have no common reference. As the physicist says about BEFORE "the Big Bang" (we cannot know) so we must say about God. Now, something of God's heart and will for us may be known.... (indeed, the purpose of Scripture is to reveal this!) but that has nothing to do with physics, with issues of time/space/mathematics. His heart and will are knowable.... His "essence" is not (here too, language lets us down). We can "know" God in the sense of relationship, love, will.... without necessarily understanding understanding the physics of His reality; not necessarily a scientific understanding (oh how language lets us down!).

So, how does puny, limited man (with our IQ's so low as to be funny)... how do we grasp this? Well..... all we have is human language, all we have is OUR reality. God is one. God is Father and also Son and also Holy Spirit. How do we hold those together, without denying both? We don't. We can't.

IMO, the beauty of the doctrine of the Trinity is that it does not attempt to. It rejects the plethora of human attempts to put this all into OUR understanding (however laughably tiny) of OUR reality (however limited and irrelevant). It simply affirms BOTH. Three yet one. One yet three. BOTH real. Not unlike accepting that Jesus is BOTH divine and human. (There's a reason why theology was called "the holy mysteries" until the 1600's). I will admit, the WORDS of the Athanasian Creed struggle (inadequately) with this.... probably too much of an attempt there.... but what I take out of this is that BALANCE, that full acceptance of BOTH, that admission of mystery.







- Josiah




.
.
 
Last edited:

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
we simply have no point of reference,
Untrue. We have His own word. He told us.

Deu_29:29 The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.

Rom_1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

Psa 76:1 To the chief Musician on Neginoth, A Psalm or Song of Asaph. In Judah is God known: his name is great in Israel.
 

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
(I have a Ph.D. in physics),
Having a Ph.D. in physics means nothing when it comes to God's word, and especially means nothing when it comes to theological or spiritual matters.

However, this guy also has a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Robert V Gentry:










 

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
Exactly. Which is why rebuking the Trinity as incomprehensible is silly.
That argument is 'idiocy'. There are plenty of incomprehensible things put forth by crazy or devil-possessed people, that make no sense (literally nonsense) whatsoever, and just because it is 'incomprehensible' does not give their faulty rationale a free pass as valid. JEHOVAH Elohiym is about truth, order, understanding, knowledge (real science), reasoning, logic, and true wisdom.
 

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
Scripture states that God is ONE
It actually says:

Deu_6:4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

Deu 6:4 שׁמע ישׂראל יהוה אלהינו יהוה אחד׃

That is a whole lot different than what you just said. Care to consider the difference?
 

Matthew ten Verseight

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
85
Location
http://www.pearltrees.com/awhn
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Seventh Day Adventist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
For laity, the best example is "the Big Bang"
Roman Catholicism's Jesuit (Georges Henri LeMaitre; SJ) construct and skullduggery. Never happened.




 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,730
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Matthew ten Verseight



NOTHING you posted changes a thing . And you are wrong about this Seventh Day Adventist minister. He did NOT have an earned doctorate, In anything. He was admitted to Georgia Institute of Technology back in the 1950's but never earned a degree. He may, perhaps, have some phony "honorary" unearned degrees but no real Ph.D. He became a Seventh Day Adventist apologists in the late 50's. He was just a poorly educated Seventh Day Adventist apologist. And nothing you noted has a THING to do with anything I posted in #34.

There are a lot of nuts with pretend degrees.... but I reject the credibility of ANY physicist since 1900 who rejects the possibility of other realities... and such declaring self to also be a theologian who insists that God is a result of creation and thus subject to the principles and definitions of creation. He'd be an idiot in science and a heretic in theology.

I reject the very Mormon idea that God is a result of Creation and subject to this reality. We are not to worship creation but the Creator. While God certainly may interact with and in this Reality (the one the resulted from Creation), He is not a part of it or subject to it. Your demand that God "fits" in YOUR (sic!) concept of this reality is simply putting yourself over God.


See post 34.




.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom