Is Speaking in Tongues and Gifts of the Spirit still available today?

Truth Seeker

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Messages
69
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
The question of whether speaking in tongues and other spiritual gifts are still available today lies at the heart of a longstanding theological debate. On one side, cessationists argue that gifts like tongues and prophecy were specific to the apostolic age, serving as signs to confirm the authenticity of the early church and ceased with the completion of Scripture (1 Corinthians 13:8-10, often cited as support). They assert that these miraculous gifts were foundational but are no longer necessary now that the "perfect" (often interpreted as the canon of Scripture) has come.

On the other side, continuationists maintain that the gifts of the Spirit, including tongues, prophecy, and healing, continue to be available to believers today as expressions of God's power and presence (1 Corinthians 12:4-11). They point to passages like Joel 2:28-29, which speaks of God pouring out His Spirit "in the last days," and 1 Corinthians 14, where Paul gives practical guidelines for the use of tongues in the church—suggesting an expectation that these gifts would persist.

This question invites us to explore theological perspectives on God’s ongoing relationship with His people, the role of spiritual experiences in the modern church, and the nature of the Holy Spirit's work today. How we interpret the purpose, duration, and application of these gifts has profound implications for worship, doctrine, and Christian life. So, do the gifts remain as part of God's active ministry, or were they intended only for the foundational period of the church?
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,702
Age
58
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Today's "tongues" is just gibberish. The Holy Scripture's tongues could be interpreted.
 

Truth Seeker

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Messages
69
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
The question of whether modern tongues are genuine or “gibberish” often comes from a desire for authenticity and alignment with Scripture. In Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians 14, we see that the biblical gift of tongues had a purpose and structure: it was a real language that could be understood or interpreted, edifying the church and drawing people to God.

Today, we must approach the matter with humility and discernment, testing everything against Scripture. The Holy Spirit still moves in powerful ways, but Paul urged that all things be done "decently and in order" (1 Corinthians 14:40). When tongues are expressed in corporate worship, it’s essential for there to be interpretation if they’re meant for the congregation, to ensure clarity and edification.

As we seek God’s truth on this matter, let's prioritize love and unity, recognizing that our desire is to glorify God and encourage each other in our faith journey.
 

tango

... and you shall live ...
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
14,711
Location
Realms of chaos
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Today's "tongues" is just gibberish.

Do you believe that to be universally true, or true in some sections of the silly fringes of the charismatic movement?

The Holy Scripture's tongues could be interpreted.

No arguments there. Paul specifically told the Corinthians that tongues should be interpreted.
 

Frankj

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2024
Messages
19
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Perhaps I shouldn't say this but I will: How does apparently babbling incoherently spread the word of salvation and reconciliation with God to those who haven't yet accepted it or maybe even have never heard it?

I don't know the truth or falsity of God, just wonder how it helps fulfill the Great Commission which I believe should be the purpose of every Christian life.

Apologies if I've offended anyone.
 

Truth Seeker

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Messages
69
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
Perhaps I shouldn't say this but I will: How does apparently babbling incoherently spread the word of salvation and reconciliation with God to those who haven't yet accepted it or maybe even have never heard it?

I don't know the truth or falsity of God, just wonder how it helps fulfill the Great Commission which I believe should be the purpose of every Christian life.

Apologies if I've offended anyone.
It wouldn't being alone. But if Biblically followed and accompanied by Interpretation could possibly and has in my experience brought the entire congregation to the altar.
 

Castle Church

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
430
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Methodist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Babbling incoherently and talking in the "language of angels" is ridiculous and does not help spread the Gospel. Any "interpretation" that I have heard was worthless as well - why interpret a fake language in the first place? The "word" that is being transmitted may as well have been give in English (or whatever real language). It seems in the scriptures "tongues" was really actual languages, someone given the gift to speak real languages to real people to spread the Gospel.
 

Truth Seeker

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 18, 2024
Messages
69
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
Babbling incoherently and talking in the "language of angels" is ridiculous and does not help spread the Gospel. Any "interpretation" that I have heard was worthless as well - why interpret a fake language in the first place? The "word" that is being transmitted may as well have been give in English (or whatever real language). It seems in the scriptures "tongues" was really actual languages, someone given the gift to speak real languages to real people to spread the Gospel.
I understand that the subject of speaking in tongues can often be a source of confusion and misunderstanding. The purpose of tongues and their interpretation is not primarily for spreading the Gospel. Biblically, speaking in tongues serves multiple functions within the church, one of which is as a sign of God's supernatural presence and as a form of personal edification (1 Corinthians 14:2-4). In public setting, meaning, during times of reverent silence in the Church (not during Altar call or song service) Paul addresses this in 1 Corinthians 14:27-28, emphasizing the need for interpretation when tongues are spoken. This interpretation is meant to edify and encourage the gathered believers, revealing a word or message from God meant specifically for the congregation's spiritual growth and encouragement.

When Paul wrote to the Corinthians, he did not dismiss the practice of speaking in tongues but sought to bring order to it, urging that if tongues are spoken in the assembly, they should be interpreted so that the church may be strengthened and encouraged. Interpretation, therefore, is not about translating a language for the purpose of evangelism but about making the mysterious communication of the Spirit intelligible so that the whole congregation may receive the benefit of what the Spirit is speaking. It is an act of faith, where what is revealed is not merely human wisdom but a demonstration of the Spirit's power and God's direct word to His people (1 Corinthians 2:13).
 
Top Bottom