Who that hypocrit is who came up w false grace? Michael Brown. The Bible calls it lewdness.
Oh he calls it hypergrace.
https://www.charismanews.com/opinio...090-a-personal-word-to-my-hyper-grace-friends
This is a response of a hyper grace teacher, this is hypergrace:
https://www.google.nl/amp/s/escapetoreality.org/2016/05/04/michael-brown-grace-controversy/amp/
Why he wants to befriend em beats me btw. That's the end time delusion.
charisma news?? really?
Have you seen the number of false teachers, wacky practices, and heresies they not only give space to, but even endorse?? Oy!
I dont know about the second guy...the first guy, Brown, I've heard a few things from, some good, some not so much, but I think he also endorses, or at least gives tacit approval, to the NAR and some of their associates, so I wouldnt put alot of faith in his opinions on false teaching.
I dont need either guys opinion, though, let them debate if they want to, I have the bible, in a trustworthy version, and I thank God for it, and His grace to preserve it, give it, and teach it.
A Baptist pastor once referenced hebrews 6 and explained to me that people who back slide were never truly saved to begin with.
So what happened when you were done laughing? I hope you told him he's full of bulloney and showed him the gospel of the grace and truth of God.
So they are saved but if they fall back then they were never saved? Or is it saying that those who became enlightened and such and such... could not fall away? Or both?
It seems like those who fall away or then against Christ and then are they crucifying him being an enemy.
Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk
>>You tell a kid, 'Here's a pile of cookies. You may eat a whole bunch.
But over here is another cookie that you may not eat. It's poison.
•Kid: But I want that cookie.
>>Please dont eat that one, it's poison, it will be harmful. Okay?
• Okay.
Two minutes later, kid is eating the poison cookie.
>>What are you doing?
•Eating a cookie.
>> The poison one?
•Yes
>>Why?
•Dunno ... I thought it would be good?
That's what it's like, when you tell ppl, 'Here's a whole book of scripture...you may read a whole bunch. But dont just pluck a couple of verses out, and read them isolated...out of context...it will be harmful. Okay?
• Okay.
Two minutes later, they're reading 3 and only 3 verses from Hebrews6, and causing harm, telling ppl they can lose their salvation.
>>What are you doing?
• Reading. 3 verses.
>>Why?
•Dunno. Thought it'd be good.
>>No, dont do that. Back up...start at 5:12 at least, then read forward, but please dont stop at 6:6 . Please keep reading at least til verse9, but preferrably to the end of the chapter, okay?
•Okay.
Two days later, they're reading the same 3 verses again, and insisting they can lose their salvation.
>>Why?
•Dunno. I thought it would be good.
>>No...not good. Dont do that. (*smh)
It's like the kid insisting on going after the poison cookie!
Btw, for the false teachers that say that verses 6:4-6 say you can lose your salvation....
They must also teach that you can never be forgiven again...twice lost, always lost...for according to their own twisted version of the passage, it's IMPOSSIBLE for them to be saved again.
Thank God that isnt true. Thank you, Jesus!