Message of the Reformation Still Needed Today!

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,674
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
.


The Message of the Reformation is MORE Needed Today than 500 Years Ago....


It has been said that Luther started the Reformation but that it never ends…. In some ways, that’s true. And this is because the issues he addressed… the “course corrections” he encouraged… well, they are still around today, still needed today. In some ways, more than in 1517, in many ways the situation in Christianity is WORSE now in terms of understanding/proclaiming the Gospel.


In Luther’s time, people believed and proclaim grace and Christ and faith (often and boldly). They taught and preached and sang about these all the time. Christians still do! The problem back then was that justification (narrow) was a “Grace/Christ plus a whole bunch of stuff you gotta do!” God plus you. What happened on the Cross and on Easter was super nice (downright awesome) but insufficient, unfinished, broken… so that WE gotta fix it, WE gotta finish it, WE gotta make it work, so that WE can enter Heaven. As I was taught in my pre-Lutheran days, "You gotta get yourself through the gates of heaven by what you do."


Five hundred years ago, people said, “Jesus is the Savior BUT to be saved you gotta love like God does, you gotta live for others like Jesus did.” Jesus plus. Today, the focus is less on loving and living, and more on decisions and feelings. “Jesus is the Savior BUT you gotta give your life to Jesus in order to be saved!” “…BUT you gotta correctly respond to an altar call!” “… BUT you gotta surrender the steering wheel of your life!” “…. But you gotta, but you gotta, but you gotta…..” Lots of big “BUTS!” Justification being synergistic, a Jesus started it but I gotta finish and fix it. So the REAL Savior.... the REAL cause of my getting into heaven is ME. I saved ME. I earned it, achieved it... by finishing and fixing what Jesus started. Thus Jesus isn't the Savior (PART Savior at best, the part that doesn't actually save anyone).


Essentially what Luther said…. What the Reformation proclaims…. What the Reformation was all about.... what Protestantism originally was all about was: There are no big buts (not even little buts). Jesus is the Savior (thus, I’m not). Jesus does the saving (thus, I don’t).

Jesus IS the Savior...
JESUS (no other name under heaven by which salvation comes - including your own; no one comes to the Father except via Jesus)...
IS (factually, really) ...
THE (the one and only, the all-sufficient) ...
SAVIOR (if it has anything to do, Jesus does it, He's got it).
Yup, it IS that simple. No buts about it. That's the message of the Reformation, that's the basis of Protestantism.


One of Jesus’ last words as He was dying for us on the Cross was, “it is finished.” We think He was right about that. We believe Him. What He gives to us is not unfinished (and we gotta complete it), it’s not damaged goods (and we gotta fix it). Sadly, so much of contemporary Christianity all assumes Jesus essentially blew it… Jesus is not the Savior (maybe a possibility-maker or a divine helper… but when we cross through those pearly gates, it will ultimately be because of something WE did or thought or said or decided… what we did to finish and complete that Jesus left undone, unfinished, broken). That’s why the Reformation is just as needed today! For many, the issue is the same: Is Jesus the Savior or am I the Savior of myself (via my love or my decisions or my surrendering or my __________)? Is it Grace/Christ/Faith ALONE or all that PLUS me (and the part that actually matters is the ME part)? The Reformation and (originally Protestantism) rejected all the big buts, all the Jesus PLUS ME stuff, all the "God helps those who help themselves" stuff. But sadly, the big buts are even more proclaimed in our time - often more by "Evangelicals" than by Catholics. Different "buts" but often bigger ones... and more of 'em.




An Illustration:


Consider the Mona Lisa, that very famous masterpiece by the genius Michelangelo hanging in the Louvue. It's insured for about $1,000,000,000.00. That's one BILLION dollars... billion.... with a "b." If you wanted to buy it, that's what it would cost - if it were for sale, which it's not. ANYTHING you might be able to offer for it would be more than laughable, it would be an insult.

But that's irrelevant because the Louvue is GIVING it to you. Yup, G.I.V.I.N.G. it to you. A free gift. The Louvue wants to bless you. And so it comes over and hangs it in your living room! BUT.... you say...... "it's missing something!" "It's broken, it's flawed!" "It's not finished!!!" And so you rush to the garage and get your box of spray paint, lots of cans of paint. And you spray some purple here and some orange there and lots of black all around. "THERE," you proudly announced, "I finished it! I fixed it! Praise be to me!" Would you do that?

LOTS do! God created a masterpiece! Made not by a talented human artist but by the Incarnate Son of God; created not with paint but by His precious blood on the Cross and His powerful resurrection from the Tomb; by His perfect holiness and vicarious death and victorious resurrection! A PRICELESS divine masterpiece worth a whole lot more than one billion bucks! And it's not for sale (and ANYTHING you could offer for it would be worse than laughable, it would be an INSULT). And one of the last things Jesus said as He created this masterpiece was "It is finished" and it is. He did it. He did it right - there's nothing to fix. He did it good - there's nothing to correct. He finished it - there's nothing to add. Just be thankful for the GIFT.

But many look down at Justification.... "It's missing something! It needs fixing! It needs finishing!" And they appoint self to do it. They run for that box of spray paint - spraying some emotion here, some decision there, some surrendering or whatever - trying to correct what Jesus got wrong. "I must add this.... I must do that....." And the MESS IT UP! Making a mockery of the Cross and insulting the Artist/Creator/Giver.

What the Reformation said.... what ORIGINALLY Protestantism proclaimed.... is JUST SAY THANKS! Jesus is the Savior, Jesus does the saving. It's just that simple. YES - a Christian, a Child of God is to do MUCH as now the recipient of the masterpiece, but those are ways to live as the recipient - not monthly payments on a purchase or yet another application of spray paint.

Unfortunately, we still live in a world obsessed with adding spray paint.... fixing and finishing.... trying to buy what's not for sale and what we can't afford. In stead of living as one BLESSED, as one LOVED, as one GIVEN - and now can bless and love and give.



An Illustration....


Lazarus was DEAD. He had been DEAD for 4 days. Stinking DEAD. He wasn't crying out for help..... He wasn't trying to scratch his way out of the tomb.... He wasn't doing a bunch of good works..... He didn't decide he wanted to live..... he didn't do anything for a pretty simple reason: He was DEAD. And the dead can't do much - certainly nothing to give themselves life. Read Ephesians 2:1-9.

But Someone arrived on the scene that COULD give life! His name was Jesus. The Bible says His heart was stirred, His spirit was stirred. NOT by the cries of Lazarus..... not by the decision of Lazarus.... not by the good works he was doing in the tomb..... not by ANYTHING that dead man in the tomb was thinking or saying or doing. Jesus was stirred, moved by something in Himself - His boundless mercy, His unconditional love, His amazing grace! THEREFORE, Jesus did something (not Lazarus.... remember.... deader than a doorknob? Stinking to high heaven?). Now Jesus didn't just will it - He employed something (a command, the word): "Come out of there!" Could Lazarus "hear" that? Nope, but Jesus gave him life (when means, then he could) and Jesus restored him to his sisters. I think we can be sure he then lived a very different life - one of gratitude.

The Bible says the unregenerate are DEAD. Spiritually DEAD. DEAD in their tresspasses. The ENEMIES of God. But God is the LIFE-giver (as we profess in the ancient Creed). God arrives at our tomb. And His heart is stirrred - not by anything DEAD people do (dead can't do much) but by His own heart, His boundless mercy, His unconditional love.... so that HE does something: gives life. Regenerates/enlivens/justifies. And restores us to the Father.

Of course, now living - we are called to live. Now having spiritual life, we are called to spiritual living. Now blessed - we are called to bless. Now loved - we are called to love. Now that He has given us life - we are called to live this new life. But living this new life is not what caused us to come to life: Jesus enlivens, Jesus justifies, Jesus saves. Us - as He did Lazarus.




Sola Gratia - Solus Christus - Sola Fide!

Soli DEO Gloria!




- Josiah




.
 
Last edited:

Confessional Lutheran

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
867
Age
50
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Divorced
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Excellent post. The Reformation isn't only a matter of clearing up outward corruptions in the institutional Church ( although that does need to happen from time to time), but also a matter of us dying to Self, drowning our old Adam in the waters of baptism and returning in prayer to those waters and letting the Holy Spirit reform our hearts. Every day of our lives should be a Reformation Day, as we live out our lives in repentance and trust God to do with us as seems good to Him. We really do need to cultivate an attitude of gratitude to Our Lord, which is only possible through the activity of the Holy Spirit working in our hearts and lives.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,513
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Excellent post. The Reformation isn't only a matter of clearing up outward corruptions in the institutional Church ( although that does need to happen from time to time), but also a matter of us dying to Self, drowning our old Adam in the waters of baptism and returning in prayer to those waters and letting the Holy Spirit reform our hearts. Every day of our lives should be a Reformation Day, as we live out our lives in repentance and trust God to do with us as seems good to Him. We really do need to cultivate an attitude of gratitude to Our Lord, which is only possible through the activity of the Holy Spirit working in our hearts and lives.
I do think this is right. Although the RCC reacted by trying to blunt the message of the Reformation, the underlying message of the Reformation (not referring here to the Solas) should be seen by Catholics as something to be welcomed by them too.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,121
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Heresy is never welcome.
 

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,208
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Neither is absolute control and misinformation
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,121
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,208
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
No, withholding scripture from the epople and having an infallible human did and does that
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,121
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No, withholding scripture from the epople and having an infallible human did and does that

Yes, as I said John Calvin's Geneva tried it and it was another heresy.
 

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,208
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Yes, as I said John Calvin's Geneva tried it and it was another heresy.
You are clever at twisting but I think most everyone here knows what the reformation was really about and why the Catholic church came against it. It challanged their absolute authority and gacve the people the ability to read and decide for themselves, something they desperately didnt want
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,121
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
You are clever at twisting but I think most everyone here knows what the reformation was really about and why the Catholic church came against it. It challanged their absolute authority and gacve the people the ability to read and decide for themselves, something they desperately didnt want

There wasn't one reformation. There was Luther's version, Calvin's version, Zwingli's version, Henry VIII's version, Edward VI's version, and Elizabeth I's version. There was also a few dozen Anabaptist versions. The reformations were a pig's breakfast from the start. Nobody could agree on what they believed only on who they rejected. They all rejected the Catholic Church and especially the pope. It made them feel good to "cast off restraint". Like the bible warns about in psalm 2 - "Let us shatter their chains and cast their yoke away from us."
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
31,630
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Excellent post. The Reformation isn't only a matter of clearing up outward corruptions in the institutional Church ( although that does need to happen from time to time), but also a matter of us dying to Self, drowning our old Adam in the waters of baptism and returning in prayer to those waters and letting the Holy Spirit reform our hearts. Every day of our lives should be a Reformation Day, as we live out our lives in repentance and trust God to do with us as seems good to Him. We really do need to cultivate an attitude of gratitude to Our Lord, which is only possible through the activity of the Holy Spirit working in our hearts and lives.

Letting the Holy Spirit? As if He wouldn't reform us otherwise?

My former pastor described sanctification as being like walking up a down escalator.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,674
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It made them feel good to "cast off restraint".


.... as the RC Denomination did in 1054. But that's another subject for another day.

But you have a tiny point: I am thinking primary of the "first wave" - of Lutherans and Reform, who agree with what I posted in the Opening Post. It is true, there were others - Henry's that originally was not theological (he remained largely RCC in his doctrine) but primarily political - only later did it become the hybrid we know. And then came the Revolutionaries, who did not want to reform but to destroy and rebuild: I agree with you, they often ended up returning to the RCC's soteriology, which is why the Gospel is still needed - even among some Protestants, the later radical reformations in some ways returned to the Roman idea of self earning salvation - albeit with less stress on loving and more on deciding and feeling (if pressed, I'd probably prefer the Catholic from of Pelagianism). But then the point of this thread is that the Gospel is STILL needed because synergistic Pelagianism still exists (and it's no longer isolated in the RC Denomination). MC, there are Lutherans who would argue we have less "issues" with the RCC than with some radical "Evangelicals" (I'd be among them) but that too is another issue for another day. I yield your point: I am speaking more of the conservative, "first wave" Reformation - which was primarily focused on correcting the Pelagianism (or perhaps semi-Pelagianism) of Catholicism. Since Trent institutionalized it for the RC Denomination, we aren't surprised to see it there to this day... but it's not only there. Thus the point of this thread.



Like the bible warns about in psalm 2 - "Let us shatter their chains and cast their yoke away from us."

Interesting point.... I think the RCC did that very thing by displacing the authority of Scripture (replacing it with itself) and the lordship of Christ (replacing it with their pope). And then it did it again in 1054 rejecting the college of Bishops and Ecumenical Councils insisting that it itself must shatter the chains of the church and crown itself the infallible Lord over all (a point my Greek Orthodox friend talks about constantly). But that too, of course, is another topic for another day (Maybe I'll get to that soon).


Back to the topic....



- Josiah



.
 

Confessional Lutheran

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
867
Age
50
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Divorced
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Letting the Holy Spirit? As if He wouldn't reform us otherwise?

My former pastor described sanctification as being like walking up a down escalator.

Of course He would. The problem with language is finding the exact words to convey meaning while being brief. What I was thinking was in regard to the Holy Spirit sanctifying our lives through His grace and our passive obedience to Him. English doesn't have the word for it, I don't think.
 

Confessional Lutheran

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
867
Age
50
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Divorced
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Obviously, it's not for us to " allow" or " disallow" the Creator of the Universe to do anything, but " let the Holy Spirit ( etc.)" just flowed out more easily than for me to make it into some kind of weird language contortion..
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,121
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Obviously, it's not for us to " allow" or " disallow" the Creator of the Universe to do anything, but " let the Holy Spirit ( etc.)" just flowed out more easily than for me to make it into some kind of weird language contortion..

The Holy Spirit can be grieved according to the holy scriptures and he can be resisted and lied to and all sorts of things that some would say is not possible if he is God.
 

Confessional Lutheran

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
867
Age
50
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Divorced
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Holy Spirit can be grieved according to the holy scriptures and he can be resisted and lied to and all sorts of things that some would say is not possible if he is God.

Quite right. On that note, good night. Excellent point, that..
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
31,630
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Of course He would. The problem with language is finding the exact words to convey meaning while being brief. What I was thinking was in regard to the Holy Spirit sanctifying our lives through His grace and our passive obedience to Him. English doesn't have the word for it, I don't think.


Language is definitely restrictive but on the other hand wording can be carried in a direction not intended, especially by people in other denominations who believe differently.
 
Top Bottom